Development of USI-Kit for Evaluation of Iodine Content in Iodized Salt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2020.10726Keywords:
Iodized salt, Iodates, Determination kit, USI-Kit, Evaluation studyAbstract
Iodine deficiency has been considered as a serious public health problem for the past decades. Universal salt iodization program is introduced and implemented to address such problem. To encourage this program in an effective and sustainable way, it is essential to regularly monitor whether salt is adequately iodized at various points along the supply chain. The traditional iodometric titration method has problems related to accessibility, cost, and time. Colorimetric test kits have been used extensively to measure coverage of iodized salt in household surveys due to its expediency and affordability. In Thailand, “I-KIT” is the most widely used. The visualization of intensive color, however, is inconvenient for untrained-user in determining the adequacy of iodine content. Thus, an improvement to make testing more precise and affordable is still required. In this respect, a new test kit namely USI-Kit was developed to assess iodine quality and semi-quantity in edible salt. The kit was tested to evaluate its performance, by comparing the result with the I-KIT and with the spectrophotometric method. Compared with I-Kit, the USI-Kit exerted the relative accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, false negative rate and Kappa coefficient value of 74.0, 76.3, 72.6, 27.4, 23.7 and 0.47, respectively. Compared to the spectrophotometric method, USI-Kit exerted the relative accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, false negative rate and Kappa coefficient value of 85.4, 80.1, 89.3, 10.7, 19.9 and 0.70, respectively. The finding suggested that a newly developed iodine test kit holds promise to be used in field inspection of iodine content in salt.
Downloads
Metrics
References
WHO, UNICEF, ICCIDD. Assessment of Iodine Deficiency Disorders and Monitoring Their Elimination: A Guide for Programme Managers. 3rd eds. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2007, p. 1-99.
J Laksanawisith. Notification of the Ministry of Public Health, Re: Edible Salt. The Government Gazette. 2011, p. 33-4.
JH Lazarus. Role of the Iodine Global Network in elimination of iodine deficiency. Recent Pat. Endocr. Metab. Immune Drug Discov. 2017; 10, 119-22.
M Andersson, V Karumbunathan and MB Zimmermann. Global iodine status in 2011 and trends over the past decade. J. Nutr. 2012; 142, 744-50.
F Rohner, MO Kangambèga, N Khan, R Kargougou, D Garnier, I Sanou, BD Quaro, N Petry, JP Wirth and P Jooste. Comparative validation of five quantitative rapid test kits for the analysis of salt iodine content: Laboratory performance, user- and field-friendliness. PLoS One 2015; 10, e0138530.
V Boonamsiri, S Noi-Snga and R Suwanik. A simple method for analysis of iodine in iodated salt. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 1976; 59, 47.
S Chaiyakul and K Maleevong. Evaluation of efficacy and usage of H36 test kit for determination of iodine level in salt. J. Public Health 2011; SI, 29-37.
HL Kundel and M Polansky. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003; 228, 303-8.
LL Diosady, JO Alberti, SF Gerald and MGV Mannar. Field tests for iodate in salt. Food Nutr. Bull. 1999. 20, 208-14.
JR Landis and GG Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33, 159-74.
JA Cohen. Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas 1960; 20, 37-46.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.