Liver Cancer Patient Classification on a Multiple-Stage using Hybrid Classification Methods

Authors

  • Orasa PATSADU Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok 10120, Thailand
  • Pongsakorn TANGCHITWILAIKUN Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok 10120, Thailand
  • Supanut LOWSUWANKUL Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok 10120, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2021.9169

Keywords:

Liver cancer, Hybrid classification methods, Abnormality level of liver estimation, Multiple-stage classifier, Decision support system

Abstract

This paper proposes a model to detect liver cancer patients and estimate the abnormality level of livers using a classification method based on an Indian liver patient dataset. The dataset is prepared by 3 processes: preliminary study, data cleansing, and handling imbalanced class to build the model based on multiple-stages using hybrid classification methods. The 1st stage is liver cancer patient detection. The 2nd stage is abnormality level of liver estimation, as divided using the DeRitis Ratio. The abnormality level of livers is divided into 3 levels: low, medium, and high, called ALL framework. Machine learning method is used to build multiple classification stages, which consist of Multilayer Perceptron, Logistic Regression, and Random Forest. The experimental results demonstrate that the 1st model (stage I) can detect liver cancer patient with 78.88 % accuracy. The 2nd model (stage II) achieves accuracy of 99.83 % for abnormality level of liver estimation. In addition, we compare our proposed model with another dataset. Our proposed model also outperforms detection with 76.73 and 98.26 % accuracy in stage I and stage II, respectively. Our proposed model is a benefit for physicians to support diagnosis and treatment, especially in the case of physicians desiring an intelligent decision support system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

M Pasha and M Fatima. Comparative analysis of meta learning algorithms for liver disease detection. J. Softw. 2017; 12, 923-33.

H Pakhale and DK Xaxa. A survey on diagnosis of liver disease classification. Int. J. Eng. Tech. 2016; 2, 132-8.

Office of Policy and Strategy of the Ministry of Public Health. Public health statistics A.D. 2008. WVO office of Printing Mill, Bangkok, Thailand.

EM Hashem and MS Mabrouk. A study of support vector machine algorithm for liver disease diagnosis. Am. J. Intell. Syst. 2014; 2, 9-14.

JD Yang and LR Roberts. Hepatocellular carcinoma: A global view. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010; 7, 448-58.

T Kitiyakara. Advances in biomarkers for HCC. Thai J. Hepatol. 2018; 1, 29-32.

T Higashi, SL Friedman, Y Hoshida. Hepatic stellate cells as key target in liver fibrosis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017; 121, 27-42.

JT Coon, G Rogers, P Hewson, D Wright, R Anderson, M Cramp, S Jackson, S Ryder, A Price and K Stein. Surveillance of cirrhosis for hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol. Assess. 2007; 11, 1-206.

SL Chan, F Mo, PJ Johnson, DYW Siu, MHM Chan, WY Lau, PBS Lai, CWK Lam, W Yeo and SCH Yu. Performance of serum α-fetoprotein levels in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with a hepatic mass. Hepato Pancreato Biliary (HPB) 2013; 16, 366-72.

S Vijayarani and S Dhayanand. Liver disease prediction using SVM and Naïve Bayes algorithms. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Tech. Res. 2015; 4, 816-20.

P Kumar and RS Thakur. Liver disorder detection using variable- neighbor weighted fuzzy K nearest neighbor approach. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07978-3.

TR Baitharul and S K Pani. Analysis of data mining techniques for healthcare decision support system using liver disorder dataset. In: Proceedings of Computational Modeling and Security, India, 2016, p. 862-70.

S Sontakke, J Lohokare and R Dani. Diagnosis of liver diseases using machine learning. In: Proceedings of the Emerging Trends and Innovation in ICT, India, 2017, p. 129-33.

MKS Maaitah, R Abiyev and IJ Bush. Intelligent classification of liver disorder using fuzzy neural system. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2017; 8, 25-31.

A Kumar and N Sahu. Categorization of liver disease using classification techniques. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2017; 5, 826-8.

M Aiswarya, S Srinivas and AGH Narayanan. Illustration of random forest and naïve bayes algorithms on Indian liver patient dataset. Int. J. Pure. Appl. Math. 2018; 119, 585-95.

A Alaybeyoglu and N Mulayim. A design of hybrid expert system for diagnosis of breast cancer and liver disorder. In: Proceedings of Research in Education and Science, Turkey, 2018, p. 345-53.

MB Priya, PL Juliet and PR Tamilselvi. Performance analysis of liver disease prediction using machine learning algorithms. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018; 5, 206-11.

A Pathan, D Mhaske, S Jadhav, R Bhondave and K Rajeswari. Comparative study of different classification algorithms on ILPD dataset to predict liver disorder. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2018; 45, 388-94.

J Jacob, JC Mathew, J Mathew, E Issac. Diagnosis of liver disease using machine learning techniques. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018; 5, 4011-14.

S Muthuselvan, S Rajapraksh, K Somasundaram and K Karthik. Classification of liver patient dataset using machine learning algorithms. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018; 7, 323-26.

G Rajesh and SMA Priyadharson. Liver cancer detection and classification based on optimum hierarchical feature fusion with PeSOA and PNN classifier. Biomed. Res. 2018; 29, 22-32.

A Das, P Das, SS Panda and S Sabut. Detection of liver cancer using modified fuzzy clustering and decision tree classifier in CT images. Math. Meth. Pattern Recognit. 2019; 29, 201-11.

M Chen, B Zhang, W Topatana, J Cao, H Zhu, S Juengpanich, Q Mao, H Yu and X Cai. Classification and mutation prediction based on histopathology H&E images in liver cancer using deep learning. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2020; 4, 1-7.

S Almotairi, G Kareem, M Aouf, B Almutairi and MAM Salem. Liver tumor segmentation in CT scans using modified SegNet. Sensors 2020; 20, 1-13.

H Kaur, S Bhalla and GPS Raghava. Classification of early and late-stage liver hepatocellular carcinoma patients from their genomics and epigenomics profiles. PLoS One 2019; 14, 1-27.

N Nahar, F Ara and MA Neloy. A comparative analysis of the ensemble method for liver disease prediction. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh, 2019, p. 1-6.

S Sathurthi and K Saruladha. Prediction of liver cancer using random forest ensemble. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2017; 116, 267-73.

C Aswathy, Code Project. Liver patient dataset classification using the intel distribution for Python, Available at: https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/liver-patient-dataset-classification-using-the-intel-distribution-for-python, accessed June 2019.

R Panthong and A Srivihok. Liver cancer classification model using hybrid feature selection based on class-dependent technique for the central region of Thailand. Information 2019; 10, 1-20.

GI Rajathi and GW Jiji. Chronic liver disease classification using hybrid whale optimization with simulated annealing and ensemble classifier. Symmetry 2019; 11, 1-21.

MS Santos, PH Abreu, PJ Garcia-Laencina, A Simao and A Carvalho. A new cluster-based oversampling method for improving survival prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. J. Biomed. Inform. 2015; 58, 49-59.

A Singh and B Pandey. An euclidean distance based KNN computational method for assessing degree of liver damage. In: Proceedings of Inventive Computation Technologies, India, 2016, p. 1-4.

M Rouhani and MH Haghighi. The diagnosis of hepatitis diseases by support vector machine and artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of Association of Computer Science and Information Technology, Singapore, 2009, p. 456-58.

ILPD (Indian Liver Patient Dataset). Data Set, UCI Machine Learning Repository, Available at: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/ILPD+ (Indian+Liver+Patient+Dataset), accessed April 2019.

K Swapna and P Babu. Critical analysis of Indian liver patients dataset using ANOVA method. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2017; 7, 19-33.

SH Adil, M Ebrahim, K Raza, SSA Ali and MA Hashmani. Liver patient classification using logistic regression. In: Proceedings of 4th Computer and Information Sciences, Malaysia, 2018, p. 1-5.

BV Ramana, SP Babu and NB Venkateswarlu. A critical comparative study of liver patients from USA and India: An exploratory analysis. Int. J. Comput. Sci. 2012; 9, 506-16.

J Han and M Kamber. Data mining concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2011.

NV Chawla, KW Bowyer, LO Hall and WP Kegelmeyer. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2002; 16, 321-57.

G Tuysuzoglu, D Birant and A Pala. Ensemble methods in environmental data mining. IntechOpen, 2018, p. 1-16.

M Botros and KA Sikaris. The deritis ratio: The test of time. Clin. Biochem. 2013; 34, 117-30.

JR Mera, B Dickson and M Feldman. Influence of gender on the ratio of serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in patients with and without hyperbilirubinemia. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2008; 53, 799-802.

Chronic Liver Disease. Available at: https://stanfordhealthcare.org/medical-conditions/liver-kidneys-and-urinary-system/chronic-liverdisease.html, accessed June 2019.

BUPA Medical Research. UCI Machine Learning Repository, Available at: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/liver+disorders, accessed April 2019.

S Mathivanan and P Jayagopal. A big data virtualization role in agriculture: A comprehensive review. Walailak J. Sci. Tech. 2019; 16, 55-77.

P Jinpon, M Jaroensutasinee and K Jaroensutasinee. Risk assessment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the population of chonburi, Thailand. Walailak J. Sci. Tech. 2017; 14, 25-33.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-14

How to Cite

PATSADU, O. ., TANGCHITWILAIKUN, P. ., & LOWSUWANKUL, S. . (2021). Liver Cancer Patient Classification on a Multiple-Stage using Hybrid Classification Methods. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST), 18(10), Article 9169 (14 pages). https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2021.9169