Kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fermentation under Metal Ions Stress during Ethanol Production

Authors

  • Prayooth SAOTHONG Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Boontiwa NINCHAN Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Klanarong SRIROTH Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Kittipong RATTANAPORN Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Wirat VANICHSRIRATANA Fermentation Technology Research Center, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2021.9133

Keywords:

Invertase, Molasses, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Metal ions, Ethanol, Glycerol, Fermentation

Abstract

This research investigated the effects of inorganic compounds or metal ions (calcium ion, Ca2+; potassium ion, K+; magnesium ion, Mg2+) on ethanol production efficiency invertase, an enzyme produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in sucrose solution, which was the substrate for yeast fermentation. The results showed that all metal ions (concentration 0.20 and 0.60 % (w/v)) acted as inhibitors on invertase activity in the order Ca2+ > K+ > Mg2+. Subsequently, these ions inhibited sugar conversion, reducing sucrose utilization and less glucose and fructose consumption based on the high content of remaining sugars in the culture medium. The reduction of the substrate was due to the consumption and an increased growth rate of S. cerevisiae, which all resulted in low efficiency of ethanol production and an increase in glycerol content. The glycerol content was increased due to yeast cells' developed mechanism or adaptation to enhance cell survival following metal ion contamination, especially from Ca2+ and K+; furthermore, the glycerol content significantly increased during the changed conditions, such as when the sugars were nearly all consumed. The kinetic parameters such as specific growth rate (µ-1), substrate consumption rate (Qs), and ethanol production of the research work were also undertaken. In conclusion, metal ion contamination in the sucrose substrate of yeast fermentation resulted in low efficiency of ethanol production, specific growth rate, and substrate consumption rate decrease with the Ca2+ ion (concentration 0.20 - 0.60 % (w/v)) acting more harshly as an inhibitor of ethanol production than the other ions, particularly where there was a high concentration of contamination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

LC Basso, TO Basso and SN Rocha. Ethanol production in Brazil: The industrial process and its impact on yeast fermentation. In: MADS Bernardes (Ed.). Biofuell production-recent developments and prospects. In Tech, Rijeka, Croatia. 2011, p. 85-100.

MA Clarke. Syrup. Encyclopedia Food Sci. Nutr. 2003; 2, 5711-7.

Y Yilmaz, I Celik and F Isik. Mineral composition and total phenolic content of pomegranate molasses. J. Food Agr. Environ. 2007; 4, 102-4.

JR Wythes, DH Wainwright and GW Blight. Nutrient composition of Queensland molasses. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. Anim. Husbandry 1978; 18, 629-34.

H Zabed, JN Sahu, A Suely, AN Boyce and G Faruq. Bioethanol production from renewable sources: Current perspectives and technological progress. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2017; 71, 475-501.

A Tesfaw and F Assefa. Current trends in bioethanol production by Saccharomyces Cerevisiae: Substrate, inhibitor reduction, growth variables, coculture, and immobilization. Int. Sch. Res. Notices 2014; 2014, 532852.

MK Somda, A Savadogo, CAT Ouattara, AS Ouattara and AS Traore. Improvement of bioethanol production using amylasic properties from Bacillus Licheniformis and yeasts strains fermentation for biomass valorization. Asian J. Biotechnol. 2011; 3, 254-61.

K Nakamura, SI Kondo, Y Kawai, N Nakajima and A Ohno. Amino acid sequence and characterization of aldo-keto reductase from bakers’ yeast. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997; 61, 375-7.

G Chandrasena, GM Walker and HJ Staines. Use of response surfaces to investigate metal ion interactions in yeast fermentations. J. American Soc. Brew. Chemist. 1997; 55, 24-9.

S Chotineeranat, R Wansuksri, K Piyachomkwan, P Chatakanonda, P Weerathaworn and K Sriroth. Effect of calcium ions on ethanol production from molasses by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sugar Tech. 2010; 2, 120-4.

K Akrida-Demertzi and AA Koutinas. Optimization of sucrose etanol fermentation for K, Na, Ca, and Cu metal contents. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1991; 30, 1-7.

M Somogyi. Notes on sugar determination. J. Biol. Chem. 1952; 195, 19-23.

W Marques, AK Gombert, V Raghavendran and BU Stambuk. Sucrose and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A relationship most sweet. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016; 16, 107.

KK Essel and YD Osei. Investigation of some kinetic properties of commercial invertase from yeast. Nat. Prod. Chem. Res. 2014; 2, 1000152.

M Whidden, A Ho, M Ivanova and S Schnell. Competitive inhibition reaction mechanisms for the two-step model of protein aggregation. Biophys. Chem. 2014; 193-194, 9-19.

GHG Costa, RC Messias, EDV Lozano, LC Nogueira and LM Blanco. The effect of calcium concentration on the physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast in fermentation. Sugar Tech. 2018; 20, 371-4.

S Hohmann. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002; 66, 300-72.

KT Scanes, S Hohrnann and BA Prior. Glycerol production by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its relevance to wine: A review. S. Afr. J. Enol. Viticulture 1998; 19, 17-24.

S Shabala and L Shabala. Ion transport and osmotic adjustment in plants and bacteria. Biomol. Concepts 2011; 5, 407-19.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-13

How to Cite

SAOTHONG, P., NINCHAN, B., SRIROTH, K., RATTANAPORN, K., & VANICHSRIRATANA, W. . (2021). Kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fermentation under Metal Ions Stress during Ethanol Production. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST), 18(6), Article 9133 (10 pages). https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2021.9133