Antimicrobial Activity of Epidermal Mucus from Top Aquaculture Fish Species against Medically-Important Pathogens


  • Gary Antonio Ceñidoza LIRIO Institute for Science and Technology Research, Center for Life Sciences Research, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Metro Manila
  • Jinky Alyssa Aquino DE LEON College of Science, Department of Biology, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Metro Manila
  • Airha Garcia VILLAFUERTE College of Science, Department of Biology, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Metro Manila



Fish mucus, freshwater fish, antimicrobial, agar-well diffusion, minimum-inhibitory concentration


Zoonotic infections caused by bacterial pathogens are considered as major threat to humans and the aquaculture industry. This problem triggered the search for various natural products from plants, microorganisms, animal tissues, and secretions to determine the presence of metabolites that may be of potential antimicrobial effects against infectious agents. However, limited attempts have been conducted to elucidate the potential use of freshwater fish mucus in against pathogens. Here, the antimicrobial activity of mucus of economically-important freshwater fish species in the Philippines: Oreochromis niloticus (tilapia), Clarias batrachus (catfish), and Channa striata (snakehead fish) was investigated against fish and human pathogens. The pooled fish mucus was extracted with succeeding centrifugation and filtration. The acidic mucus extracts were tested for antimicrobial-inhibitory effects and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by agar-overlay diffusion and microbroth plate dilution method, respectively. The results showed that all fish mucus extracts exhibited antimicrobial effects against test pathogens with catfish exhibiting the highest inhibitory effects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p = 0.096), Klebsiella pneumoniae (p = 0.000), Enterococcus faecalis (p = 0.665), Micrococcus luteus (p = 0.000), Aeromonas hydrophila (p = 0.000), Staphylococcus aureus (p = 0.000), Escherichia coli (p = 0.000), and Serratia marcescens (p = 0.000) as compared to the broad-spectrum antibiotic control, Cefoperazone. Interestingly, catfish mucus revealed inhibitory effects against Gram-positive S. aureus and M. luteus at the lowest concentration (1:4 dilution). The present findings revealed the potential antimicrobial use of freshwater fish mucus against medically-important pathogens.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


C Stephen, H Artsob, WR Bowie, M Drebot, E Fraser, T Leighton, M Morshed, C Ong and D Patrick. Perspectives on emerging zoonotic disease research and capacity building in Canada. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2004; 15, 339-44.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Animals (Zoonotic), Available at:, accessed February 2018.

AM Declercq, F Haesebrouck, WV Broeck, P Bossier and A Decostere. Columnaris disease in fish: A review with emphasis on bacterium-host interactions. Vet. Res. 2013; 44, 27.

SC Park, I Shimamura, M Fukunaga, KI Mori and T Nakai. Isolation of bacteriophages specific to a fish pathogen, pseudomonas plecoglossicida, as a Candidate for disease control. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000; 66, 1416-22.

SB Park, T Aoki and TS Jung. Pathogenesis of and strategies for preventing Edwardsiella tarda infection in fish. Vet. Res. 2012; 43, 67.

M Crane and A Hyatt. Viruses of fish: An overview of significant pathogens. Viruses 2011; 3, 2025-46.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles, Available at:, accessed on February 2018.

Department of Health, Republic of the Philippines. Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Disease Program, from Available at:, accessed February 2018.

S Brusaferro, L Arnoldo, G Cattani, E Fabbro, B Cookson, R Gallagher, P Hartemann, J Holt, S Kalenic, W Popp, G Privitera, V Prikazsky, C Velasco, C Suetens and CV Santos. Harmonizing and supporting infection control training in Europe. J. Hospital Infect. 2015; 89, 351-6.

S Gatermann, R Funfstuck, W Handrick, L Leitritz, K Naber and A Podbielski. MIQ 02: Urinary Tract Infections: Quality Standards for Microbiological Infections. Urban and Fischer, Munchen, 2005, p. 8-21.

AY Peleg and DC Hooper. Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. New England J. Med. 2010; 362, 1804-13.

MA Cooper and D Shlaes. Fix the antibiotics pipeline. Nature 2011; 472, 32.

G Guven and O Uzun. Principles of good use of antibiotics in hospitals. J. Hospital Infect. 2003; 53, 91-6.

PFM Dermott, RD Walker and DG White. Antimicrobials: Modes of action and mechanisms of resistance. Int. J. Toxicol. 2003; 22, 135-43.

MF Grill and RK Maganti. Neurotoxic effects associated with antibiotic use: Management considerations. British J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2011; 72, 381-93.

JF Westphal, D Vetter and JM Brogard. Hepatic side-effects of antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1994; 33, 387-401.

G Samuelsson and L Bohlin. Drugs of Natural Origin: A Textbook of Pharmacognosy. 5th ed. Swedish Pharmaceutical Press,Stockholm, Sweden, 2004.

GM Mark. Natural products as a source for novel antibiotics. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2016; 37, 689-70.

MA Haniffa, S Viswanathan, D Jancy, K Poomari and S Manikandan. Antibacterial studies of fish mucus from two marketed air-breathing fishes: Channa striatus and Heteropneustes fossilis. Int. Res. J. Microbiol. 2014; 5, 22-27.

V Rao, K Marimuthu, T Kupusamy, X Rathinam, MV Arasu, NA Al-Dhabi and J Arockiaraj. Defense properties in the epidermal mucus of different freshwater fish species. Aquaculture Aquarium Conserv. Legislat. Int. J. Bioflux Soc. 2015; 8, 184-94.

A K Tyor and S Kumari. Biochemical characterization and antibacterial properties of fish skin mucus of fresh water fish, hypophthalmichthys nobilis. Int. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2016; 8, 132-6.

S Bragadeeswaran, S Priyadharshini, K Prabhu and SRS Rani. Antimicrobial and hemolytic activity of fish epidermal mucus Cynoglossus arel and Arius caelatus. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2011; 4, 305-9.

V Negus. The functions of mucus. Acta Otolaryngol. 1963; 56, 204-14.

GA Ingram. Substances involved in the natural resistance of fish to infection: A review. J. Fish Biol. 1980; 16, 23-60.

KL Shephard. Mucus on the epidermis of fish and its influence on drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1993; 11, 403-17.

S Subramanian, NW Ross and SLM Kinnon. Comparison of antimicrobial activity in the epidermal mucus extracts of fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B 2008; 150, 85-92.

R Vennila, R Kumar, S Kanchana, M Arumugam, S Vijayalakshmi and T Balasubramaniam. Preliminary investigation on the antimicrobial and proteolytic property of the epidermal mucus secretion of marine stingrays. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2011; 1, 239-43.

AM Cole, P Weis and G Diamond. Isolation and characterization of pleurocidin, an antimicrobial peptide in the skin secretions of winter flounder. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272, 12008-13.

L Cantas and K Suer. Review: The important bacterial zoonoses in “one health” concept. Frontiers Public Health 2014; 2, 144.

P Manivasagan, N Annamalai, SA Kumar and PS Kumar. Studies on the proteinaceous gel secretion from the skin of the catfish Arius maculatus. Afr. J. Biotech. 2009; 8, 7125-9.

KL Shephard. Mucus on the epidermis of fish and its influence on drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1993; 11, 403-17.

AD Pickering. The distribution of mucous cells in the epidermis of the brown trout Salmo trutta (L.) and the char Salvelinus alpinus (L.). J. Fish Biol. 1974; 6, 111-8.

N Blackstock and AD Pickering. Changes in the concentration and histochemistry of epidermal mucous cells during the alevin and fry stages of the Brown troutSalmo trutta. J. Zool. 1982; 197, 463-71.

NY Lebedeva. Skin and Superficial Mucus of Fish: Biochemical Structure and Functional Role. In: DN Saksena (Ed). Ichthyology: Recent Research Advances. New Hampshire: Science Publishers. 1999, p. 179-9.

REW Hancock and HG Sahl. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nature Biotech. 2006; 24, 1551-7.

L Ming, P Xiaoling, L Yan, W Lili, W Qi, Y Xiyong, W Boyao and H Ning. Purification of antimicrobial factors from human cervical mucus. Human Reproduct. 2007; 22, 1810-5.

RE Hancock and R Lehrer. Cationic peptides: A new source of antibiotics. Trends Biotech. 1998; 16, 82-8.

YH Liao, MB Brown and GP Martin. Turbidimetric and HPLC assays for the determination of formulated lysozyme activity. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2001; 53, 549-54.

Z Oren and Y Shai. A class of highly potent antibacterial peptides derived from pardaxin, A pore-forming peptide isolated from moses sole fish Pardachirus marmoratus. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996; 237, 303-10.

A Ellis. Innate host defense mechanisms of fish against viruses and bacteria. Develop. Comp. Immunol. 2001; 25, 827-39.

A Falco, A Martinez-Lopez, JP Coll and A Estepa. The potential for antimicrobial peptides to improve fish health in aquaculture. Infect. Dis. Aquaculture 2012; 2012, 457-79.

A Patrzykat, JW Gallant, JK Seo, J Pytyck and SE Douglas. Novel antimicrobial peptides derived from flatfish genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003; 47, 2464-70.

F Aranishi and N Mano. Response of skin cathepsins to infection of Edwardsiella tarda in Japanese flounder. Fish. Sci. 2000; 66, 169-70.

A Patrzykat, L Zhang, V Mendoza, GK Iwama and REW Hancock. Synergy of histone-derived peptides of Coho Salmon with Lysozyme and flounder Pleurocidin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001; 45, 1337-42.

Y Kitani, C Tsukamoto, G Zhang, H Nagai, M Ishida, S Ishizaki, K Shimakura, K Shiomi and Y Nagashima. Identification of an antibacterial protein asL-amino acid oxidase in the skin mucus of rockfish Sebastes schlegeli. FEBS J. 2006; 274, 125-36.




How to Cite

LIRIO, G. A. C., DE LEON, J. A. A., & VILLAFUERTE, A. G. (2018). Antimicrobial Activity of Epidermal Mucus from Top Aquaculture Fish Species against Medically-Important Pathogens. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST), 16(5), 329–340.