Possibilities of Inadequate Physical Load Reduction by Ergonomic Rationalization of Working Environment



‘Human’ is the most important element in the working system: human - machine - environment. It is necessary to ensure the good health condition of workers for continuous production processes. This article is focused on the possibilities of inadequate physical load reduction by partial ergonomic rationalization of working environment - warehouse of building materials. This problem is analysed by using the Key Indicator Method (KIM). This method immediately determines the affecting physical load. Constituent optimization models of the working environment are suggested for reduction by software. The presented method of inadequate physical load reduction is applicable not only in the construction industry but also in engineering.


Ergonomic rationalization, Key Indicator Method, physical load, Sketchup Pro, working environment

Full Text:



D Katunský, E Dlníková, J Katunská, M Lopušniak, J Korim, P Oravec, E Pavlušová, A Sedláková and A Vaškovičová. Physical components evaluation of the internal environment in the industry. In: Proceedings of the 28 Vedecká Konferencia Katedier a Ustavov Konštrukcií Pozemných Stavieb, Bratislava, Slovakia, 2004, p. 28-36.

M Lorko. Ergonomics in Manufacturing. Vol I. Technical University of Kosice, Prešov, 2001, p. 28-36.

M Flimel and D Duplakova. Ergonomic rationalization of transmitted vibration to hands of the workers. J. Vib. Contr. 2017; 23, 517-525.

M Kočiško, M Telišková, P Baron and J Zajac. An integrated working enviroment using advanced augmented reality techniques. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, Nagoya, Japan, 2017, p. 279-83.

M Flimel. Analysis of selected ergonomic problems of left-handed workers in production activity. Ann. Facul. Eng. Hunedoara 2012; 10, 83-6.

A Mital and U Wright. Weight limits for foldaway wheelchairs. Ergon. Des. Quart. Human Factors Appl. 1996; 4, 26-30.

M Flimel and D Dupláková. Ergonomics in Working Environments. Technical University of Kosice, Prešov, 2014, p. 18-23.

K Vänni, P Virtanen, T Luukkaala and C Nygard. Relationship between perceived work ability and productivity Los. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2012; 18, 299-309.

Government Regulation of SR No. 281/2006 Coll on the Minimum Safety and Health Requirements for the Manual Handling of Loads.

Key Indicator Method for Assessing Physical Workload during Manual Handling Operations, Available at: https://www.av.se/globalassets/filer/arbetsmiljoarbete-och-inspektioner/worksheet-for-kim-mo-with-brief-instructions.pdf, accessed January 2017.

U Steinberg. New tools in Germany: Development and appliance of the first two KIM (“lifting, holding and carrying” and “pulling and pushing”) and practical use of these methods. Work 2012; 41, 3990-6.

A Klussmann, F Liebers, F Brandstädt, M Schust, P Serafin, A Schäfer, H Gebhardt, B Hartmann and U Steinberg. Validation of newly developed and redesigned key indicator methods for assessment of different working conditions with physical workloads based on mixed-methods design: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2017; 7, e015412.

B Roskes. SketchUp 2015 Hands-On: Basic and Advanced Exercises. 8th eds. 3DVinci Publication, USA, 2015, p. 784.

D Lehocká, I Hlavatý and S Hloch. Rationalization of material flow in production of semitrailer frame for automotive industry. Technical Gazette 2016; 23, 1215-20.

J Katunská and S Tóth. Recovery options of industrial buildings. Střechy Fasády Izolace 2012; 19, 58-60.

M Flimel and D Duplakova. Application of the ergonomic redesign in terms of workplace rationalization. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015; 718, 239-44.


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Online ISSN: 2228-835X


Last updated: 12 August 2019