Ethnobotany of Phu Thai Ethnic Group in Nakhon Phanom Province, Thailand


  • Rapeeporn PHOLHIAMHAN Plant and Invertebrate Taxonomy and Its Applications Unit Group, Walai Rukhavej Botanical Research Institute, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150
  • Surapon SAENSOUK Plant and Invertebrate Taxonomy and Its Applications Unit Group, Walai Rukhavej Botanical Research Institute, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150
  • Piyaporn SAENSOUK Plant and Invertebrate Taxonomy and Its Applications Unit Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150



Informant consensus factor (ICF), cultural important index (CI), fidelity level (FL %)


The present study aimed to study the diversity of plants used by Phu Thai ethnic groups in Nakhon Phanom province, and to find out the correlation between genders, age, and indigenous knowledge of the Phu Thai groups. The data were analyzed by using independent-samples t-test, one way ANOVA, cultural importance index (CI), informant consensus factor (ICF), and fidelity level (FL %). The results showed that there were 329 plant species from 89 families used in the daily life by the Phu Thai.The largest number of plant species were from Fabaceae (42 species, 12.77 %), followed by Zingiberaceae (20 species, 6.07 %), and Poaceae (15 species, 4.56 %). One hundred and ninety nine species were edible and used for consumption, 176 species for medicine, 56 species for cultural purposes, and 79 for other uses. The highest informant consensus factor (ICF) of medicinal plants were calculated for injuries (ICF = 0.961) indicating the highest degree of agreement among the informants knowledge of medicinal plants used to treat disorders in this category. The highest fidelity level (FL %) values were calculated for Crinum asiaticum L. var. asiaticum (93.62%), showing the conformity of knowledge regarding use of this plant to heal ankle sprains and postpartum women.

          The CI values were calculated for Oryza sativa L. (CI = 2.74), followed by Saccharum officinarum L. (CI = 2.64), and Cocos nucifera L. (CI = 2.57), respectively. The most frequently used parts of the plant were leaves (82 species; 21.20 %) followed by fruits (70 species; 17.99 %), and stems (46 species; 11.85 %). Tree was the most common plant habit (77 species; 26.50 %), followed by the herb (72 species; 22.90 %), and climber (34 species; 9.20 %). The plants were gathered from cultivated fields more than from the forest. The ethnobotanical knowledge listed by males and females did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). The older informants had significantly more knowledge of medicinal plant uses than younger informants (p < 0.05). The Phu Thai ethnic group used Oryza sativa L. to make glutinous fermented liquors called “U”. It contains a variety of plants such as Alpinia galangal (L.) Willd., Lepisanthes rubiginosa (Roxb.) Leenh., Albizia myriophylla Benth., Paederia linearis Hook. f. var. linearis, Saccharum officinarum L., Streptocaulon juventas (Lour.) Merr., Oroxylum indicum (L.) Benth. ex Kurz, Harrisonia perforata (Blanco) Merr., and Tacca leontopetaloides (L.) Kuntze.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


K Choudhary, M Singh and U Pillai. Ethnobotanical survey of Rajasthan: An update. Am. Eur. J. Bot. 2009; 2, 22-9.

CM Cotton. Ethnobotany: Principles and applications. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1996.

P Pannet. 2008, Life Belief and Ritual Relating to Herbal Utilization: A Medical Ethobotanic Study in Phu Thai Ethnic Group at Don Mai Khum Village Kalasin Province Thailand. MD. Dissertation. Mahidol University, Thailand.

P Boonchai. Knowledge and Belief of Phu Thai Health Care Using Herbal Medicine in Yasothon Province. Maha Sarakham Province: Northeastern Art and Culture Research Institute, Maha Sarakham University, 1999.

A Arunpipattanapong. 2011, Cringestive Tourism Development Plan for Ethnic Groups in Nakhon Phanom Province. MD. Dissertation. Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Department of Provincial Administration, Available at:, accessed July 2016.

GJ Martin. Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual. Chapman & Hall, London, 1995.

E Thomas, I Vandebroek and PV Damme. What works in the field? A comparison of different interviewing methods in ethnobotany with special reference to the use of photographs. Econ. Bot. 2007; 61, 376-84.

FEM Cook. Economic Botany Data Collection Standard. Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew. United Kingdom, 1995.

J Tardío and M Pardo-de-Santayana. Cultural importance indices: A comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Econ. Bot. 2008; 62, 24-39.

RT Trotter and MH Logan. Informants Consensus: A New Approach for Identifying Potentially Effective Medicinal Plants. In: NL Etkin (ed.). Plants in Indigenous Medicine and Diet. Redgrave Publishing, New York, Bedford Hill, 1986, p. 91-112.

L Gazzaneo, R de Lucena and U de Albuquerque. Knowledge and use of medicinal plants by local specialists in an region of Atlantic Forest in the state of Pernambuco (Northeastern Brazil). Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2005; 1, 1-8.

J Friedman, Z Yaniv, A Dafni and D Palewitch. A preliminary classification of the healing potential of medicinal plants, based on a rational analysis of an ethnopharmacological field survey among Bedouins in the Negev Desert, Israel. Ethnopharmacy 1986; 16, 275-87.

Z Abbas, SM Khan, AM Abbasi, A Pieroni, Z Ullah, M Iqbal and Z Ahmad. Ethnobotany of the Balti community, Tormikvalley, Karakorum range, Baltistan, Pakistan. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2016; 12, 38.

Y Dogan. Traditionally used wild edible greens in the Aegean Region of Turkey. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2012; 81, 329-42.

K Tangjitman, C Wongsawad, K Kamwong, T Sukkho and C Trisonthi. Ethnomedicinal plants used for digestive system disorders by the Karen of northern Thailand. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2015; 11, 1-13.

A Inta, P Trisonthi and C Trisonthi. Analysis of traditional knowledge in medicinal plants used by Yuan in Thailand. Ethnopharmacy 2013; 149, 344-51.

K Srithi, H Balslev, P Wangpakapattanawong, P Srisanga and C Trisonthi. Medicinal plant knowledge and its erosion among the Mien (Yao) in northern Thailand. Ethnopharmacy 2009; 123, 335-42.

NG Passalacqua, PM Guarrera and GD Fine. Contribution to the knowledge of the folk plant medicine in Calabria region (Southern Italy). Fitoterapia 2007; 78, 52-8.

E Lulekal, Z Asfaw, E Kelbessa and PV Damme. Ethnomedicinal study of plants used for human ailments in Ankober District, North Shewa Zone, Amhara Region. Ethiopia J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2013; 9, 63.

A Edna. Traditional knowledge in a rural community in the Semi- Arid Region of Brazil: Age and gender patterns and their implications for plant conservation. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2015; 14, 331-44.

E Estrada. Ethnobotany in the Cumbres de Monterrey National Park, NuevoLeón, México. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2007; 3, 8.

R John. GC-MS studies of Crinum asiaticum L. leaves and flowers. Res. J. Pharm. Phytochem. 2011; 3, 232-5.

M Rahmatullah, M Haque and S Jahan. Ethnomedicinal uses of crinum asiaticum: A review. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014; 3, 119-28.

RK Anand, MP Singh, SV Dwivedi, S Ram and N Khare. Ethnobotanical study of trees found in District Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh. Technofame 2013; 2, 1-5.




How to Cite

PHOLHIAMHAN, R., SAENSOUK, S., & SAENSOUK, P. (2017). Ethnobotany of Phu Thai Ethnic Group in Nakhon Phanom Province, Thailand. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST), 15(10), 679–699.



Research Article