Improving Crop Production by Field Management Strategies using Water Driven Crop Model

Meysam ABEDINPOUR

Abstract


Irrigation water is a major limiting factor in agricultural production. Crop growth simulation models of varying complexity have been developed for predicting the effects of water, soil, and nutrients on the grain and biomass yields and water productivity of different crops. Hence, a field experiment was conducted at Gorgan city in Iran to calibrate a water productivity model, Aquacrop, for soybean, in 2011. Irrigation applications comprised irrigation at (W1): 60 %, (W2): 70 %, (W3): 80 %, and (W4): 100 % of field capacity (FC). The results showed that the simulated water productivity (WP), biomass yield (BY), and grain yield (GY) using the Aquacrop model were consistent with the measured GY, BY, and WP, with corresponding coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.96, 0.90, and 0.87, respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) and model efficiency (E) for GY and BY ranged from 0.87 to 0.96, 0.1 to 1.2, and 0.87 to 0.96, respectively. Therefore, the Aquacrop model is a useful decision making tool for use in efforts to optimize soybean irrigation management.


Keywords


Aquacrop model, calibration, Gorgan, soybean, deficit irrigation

Full Text:

PDF

References


FAO. Statistical Yearbook 2012 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012), Available at: http://go.nature.com/nfmwxx, accessed December 2013.

M Valipour. Necessity of irrigated and rainfed agriculture in the world. Irrig. Drain. Syst. Eng. 2013; S9, e001.

M Valipour, MZ Ahmadi, M Raeini-Sarjaz, AMG Sefidkouhi, A Shahnazari, R Fazlola and A Darzi-Naftchali. Agricultural water management in the world during past half century. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2014; 61, 657-78.

M Valipour. Future of agricultural water management in Africa. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2014; 61, 1-21.

M Valipour. A comprehensive study on irrigation management in Asia and Oceania. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2015; 61, 1247-71.

M Valipour. What is the tendency to cultivate plants for designing cropping intensity in irrigated area? Adv. Water Sci. Tech. 2015; 1, 1-12.

J Cavero. Simulation of maize yield under water stress with the EPIC phase and CROPWAT models. Agron. J. 2000; 92, 679-90.

CB Tanner and TR Sinclair. Efficient Water use in Crop Production: Research. In: HM Taylor, WR Jordan and TR Sinclair (eds.). Limitations to Efficient Water use in Crop Production. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, USA, 1983, p. 1-27.

P Steduto, TC Hsiao, D Raes and E Fereres. AquaCrop the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. Agron. J. 2009; 101, 426-37.

D Raes, P Steduto, TC Hsiao and E Fereres. AquaCrop the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and soft ware description. Agron. J. 2009; 101, 438-47.

JW Jones, G Hoogenboom, CH Porter, KJ Boote, WD Batchelor, LA Hunt, PW Willken, U Singh, AJ Gijsman and JT Ritchie. The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur. J. Agron. 2003; 18, 235-65.

CO Stockle, M Donateli and R Nelson. CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model. Eur. J. Agron. 2003; 18, 289-307.

HS Yang, A Dobermann, JL Lindquist, DT Walters, TJ Arkebauer and KG Cassman. Hybrid maize-A maize simulation model that combines two crop modeling approaches. Field Crops Res. 2004; 87, 131-54.

TC Hsiao, LK Heng, P Steduto, D Raes and E Fereres. Aqua crop model parameterization and testing for maize. Agron. J. 2009; 101, 448-59.

M Abedinpour, A Sarangi, TBS Rajput, M Singh, H Pathak and T Ahmad. Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model for Maize crop in a semi-arid environment. Agric. Water Manag. 2012; 110, 55-66.

M Valipour and S Eslamian. Analysis of potential evapotranspiration using 11 modified temperature-based models. Int. J. Hydrol. Sci. Tech. 2014; 4, 192-207.

M Valipour. Evaluation of radiation methods to study potential evapotranspiration of 31 provinces. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 2015; 127, 289-303.

M Valipour. Assessment of different equations to estimate potential evapotranspiration versus FAO Penman Monteith method. Act. Adv. Agric. Sci. 2014; 2, 14-27.

M Valipour. Analysis of potential evapotranspiration using limited weather data. Appl. Water Sci. 2017; 7, 187-97.

M Valipour. Application of new mass transfer formulae for computation of evapotranspiration. J. Appl. Water Eng. Res. 2014; 2, 33-46.

M Valipour. Calibration of mass transfer-based models to predict reference crop evapotranspiration. Appl. Water Sci. 2017; 7, 625-35.

M Valipour. Investigation of Valiantzas’ evapotranspiration equation in Iran. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2015; 121, 1-2.

JE Nash and JV Sutcliffe. River flows forecasting through conceptual models: Part 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970; 10, 282-90.


Refbacks





http://wjst.wu.ac.th/public/site/images/admin/image012_400

Online ISSN: 2228-835X

http://wjst.wu.ac.th

Last updated: 20 June 2019