Development of Key Performance Indicators of Municipality by Applying an Analytical Hierarchy Process: Case Study of Lower Northeastern Thailand, Group II

Authors

  • Peema PORNPRASERT Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani 34190
  • Kanisorn POONIKOM Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani 34190

Keywords:

Key performance indicators, municipality, analytical hierarchy process

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to develop key performance indicators (KPIs) in municipalities by applying a priority assessment in particular areas of lower Northeastern Thailand, Group II. Questionnaires were used to gather data from 200 municipality office administrations and 17 experienced professionals. To begin with the investigation of KPIs concerned the competency of municipality. The criteria of competency were categorized initially into 5 parts. All KPIs were analyzed by the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Affinity Diagram Technique (ADT). Grouped KPIs were then used to construct a questionnaire to provide both validity and reliability. For data analysis, confirmatory factor analysis using Bartlett’s Test Sphericity technique was used. Professionals later evaluated the priority assessment with an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). It found that all the 487 KPIs formerly used can be extracted into 38 KPIs. To beneficial contribution, it is cost saving and consistency to assess the competency in municipality office in Thailand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

T Phunikhom. 2007, Assessment and Improvement of Disc Plow Frame. Master of Industrial Engineering Thesis. Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

S Thummaseang. The suitable culture model for knowledge management in small and medium - size enterprises: Case study of agricultural machinery. In: Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering Network Conference 2013, Chon Buri, Thailand, 2013, p. 241-9.

P Tiruschaya. An evaluate of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Songkhla Municipality. Hadyai University Press, Songkhla, 2014, p. 60-91.

J Groarke. Best Practices in Local Development. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2001, p. 1-174.

LM Hua. Integration QFD and benchmarking in strategic marketing. J. Bus. Ind. Market. 2001; 22, 41-50.

A Aunthaisong. 2008, The Suitable Model for Improvement the Rice Mill. Master of Industrial Engineering Thesis. Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.

N Thanathitikorn. 2006, Development of Administration in Private Vocational School by Balance Scorecard (BSC). Ph.D. Dissertation. Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

J Punpatchivin. Future Research Technique EDFR (Ethnographic Delphi Futures Research): Policy Analysis Technique. Chulalongkorn University Press, Bangkok, 2005, p. 1-8.

AL Comrey and HB Lee. A First Couse in Factor Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publisher, New Jersey, 1992, p. 46-9.

P Singhchangchai. Principles and Using Multivariate Analysis in Nurse Research. Chan Muang Press, Songkhla, Thailand, 2006, p. 79-81.

V Tunsirimongkol. AHP: The Most Popular Decision Process in the World. Graphic and Printing Center, Bangkok, 2013, p. 62-90.

P Singhapun. The Study of Pareto Distributions. Handbook of Statistic, Chiang Mai University Printing Center, Chiang Mai, 2012, p. 108-14.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-04

How to Cite

PORNPRASERT, P., & POONIKOM, K. (2015). Development of Key Performance Indicators of Municipality by Applying an Analytical Hierarchy Process: Case Study of Lower Northeastern Thailand, Group II. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST), 13(6), 399–410. Retrieved from https://wjst.wu.ac.th/index.php/wjst/article/view/1809

Issue

Section

Research Article