Optimization of Bacterial Cellulose Production from Wastewater of Noodle Processing by Komagataeibacter sp. PAP1 and Bio-Cellulose Paper Production

Tanyarat  SUTTHIPHATKUL; Amornrat  SUWANPOSRI; Duangjai  OCHAIKUL

doi:10.48048/wjst.2021.6508

Authors

Tanyarat SUTTHIPHATKUL Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
Amornrat SUWANPOSRI Department of Applied Science and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industrial Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok Chanthaburi Campus, Chanthaburi 22210, Thailand
Duangjai OCHAIKUL Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2021.6508

Keywords:

Bacterial Cellulose, Fermented Rice Noodle Wastewater, Paper production, Komagataeibacter sp.

Abstract

Bacterial Cellulose (BC) production from Fermented Rice Noodle Wastewater (FRNW) was fermented by Komagataeibacter sp. PAP1. In order to increase the production of BC, the FRNW-based medium was prepared and optimized for the cultivation of this bacterium. The optimized FRNW-based medium was composed of 5 % (w/v) mannitol, 0.1 % (w/v) beef extract, 0.5 % (v/v) ethanol, 1 % (v/v) acetic acid, pH 7.0 which were incubated at 30 °C for 10 days. Under these conditions, BC yielded 11.76 ± 0.34 g/L higher (4.40 fold) than the standard Hestrin-Schramm (HS) medium. The study on growth and BC production by Komagataeibacter sp. PAP1 in optimized culture condition showed that BC production by Komagataeibacter sp. PAP1 was growth-associated. The bacterial cell of Komagataeibacter sp. PAP1 increased exponentially from the 3^rd to 5^th day. The BC paper sheets produced using the obtained BC pellicle from an optimized FRNW-based medium gave higher mechanical strength than those from standard HS medium. This study reveals the use of FRNW as a substrate for BC production. The results indicated that FRNW, which is more environmentally friendly, can be used as an alternative low-cost substrate for BC production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Y Yamada, P Yukphan, HT Lan Vu, Y Muramatsu, D Ochaikul, S Tanasupawat and Y Nakagawa. Description of Komagataeibacter gen. nov., with proposals of new combinations (Acetobacteraceae). J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2012; 58, 397-404.

A Cavka, X Guo, SJ Tang, S Winestrand, LJ Jönsson and F Hong. Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013; 6, 25.

E Tsouko, C Kourmentza, D Ladakis, N Kopsahelis, I Mandala, S Papanikolaou, F Paloukis, V Alves and A Koutinas. Bacterial cellulose production from industrial waste and by-product streams. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015; 16, 14832-49.

PR Chawla, IB Bajaj, SA Survase and RS Singhal. Microbial cellulose: Fermentative production and applications. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2009; 47, 107-27.

AH Basta and H El-Saied. Performance of improved bacterial cellulose application in the production of functional paper. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009; 107, 2098-107.

WK Czaja, DJ Young, M Kawezki and JR Brown. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8, 1-12.

J Shah and RM Brown. Towards electronic paper displays made from microbial cellulose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005; 66, 352-5.

P Carreira, JAS Mendes, E Trovatti, LS Serafim, CSR Freive, AJD Silvestre and CP Neto. Utilization of residues from agro-forest industries in the production of high value bacterial cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 2011; 102, 7354-60.

JM Wu and RH Liu. Thin stillage supplementation greatly enhances bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012; 90, 116-21.

FP Gomes, NHCS Silva, E Trovatti, SL Serafim, MF Duarte, AJD Silvestre, CP Neto and CSR Freire. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass. Bioenerg. 2013; 55, 205-11.

D Lin, P Lopez-Sanchez, R Li and Z Li. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 using only waste beer yeast as nutrient source. Bioresour. Technol. 2014; 151, 113-9.

C Huang, HJ Guo, L Xiong, B Wang, SL Shi and XF Chen. Using wastewater after lipid fermentation as substrate for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016; 131, 198-202.

S Siripattanakul-Ratpukdi. Ethanol production potential from fermented rice noodle wastewater treatment using entrapped yeast cell sequencing batch reactor. Appl. Water Sci. 2012; 2, 47-53.

A Suwanposri, Y Yamada, P Yukaphan and D Ochaikul, D. Identification and biocellulose production of Gluconacetobacter strains isolated from tropical fruits in Thailand. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol. 2013; 7, 70-82.

D Mikkelsen, BM Flanagen, GA Dykes and MJ Gidley. Influence of different carbon sources on bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009; 107, 576-83.

JD Fontana, CG Joerke, M Baron, M Maraschin, AG Ferreira, I Torriani, AM Souza, MB Soares, MA Fontana and MF Guimaraes. Acetobacter cellulosic biofilms search for new modulators of cellulogenesis and native membrane treatments. Appl. Biotechnol. 1997; 6, 327-38.

F Jahan, V Kumar, G Rawat and RK Saxena. Production of microbial cellulose by a bacterium isolated from fruit. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012; 167, 1157-71.

RE Buchanan and NE Gibbons. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 8th ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1974.

KV Ramana, A Tomar and L Singh. Effect of various carbon and nitrogen sources on cellulose synthesis by Acetobacter xylinum. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000; 16, 245-8.

VT Nguyen, B Flanagan, MJ Gidley and GA Dykes. Characterization of cellulose production by a Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain from Kombucha. Curr. Microbiol. 2008; 57, 449-53.

GZ Pourramezan, AM Roayaei and QR Qezelbash. Optimization of culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter sp. 4B-2. Biotechnol. J. 2009; 8, 150-4.

SY Kim, JN Kim, YJ Wee, DH Park and HW Ryu. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sp. RKY 5 isolated from persimmon vinegar. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2006; 131, 705-15.

BS Hungund and SG Gupta. Improved production of bacterial cellulose from Gluconacetobacter persimmonis GH-2. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2010; 2, 127-33.

HJ Son, HG Kim, KK Kim, HS Kim, YG Kim and SJ Lee. Increased production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter sp. V6 in synthetic media under shaking culture conditiond. Biosour. Technol. 2003; 86, 215-9.

M Gama, P Gatenolm and D Klemm. Bacterial Nanocellulose, A Sophisticated Multifunctional Material. CRC Press, Florida, 2013.

C Castro, R Zuluaga, JL Putaux, G Caro, I Mondragon and P Gañán. Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011; 84, 96-102.

MU Rani, NK Rastogi and KAA Appaiah. Statistical optimization of medium composition for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter hansenii UAC09 using coffee cherry husk extract-an agro-industry waste. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011; 21, 739-45.

Y Yang, J Jia, J Xing, J Chen and S Lu. Isolation and characteristics analysis of a novel high bacterial cellulose producing strain Gluconacetobacter intermedius CIs26. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013; 92, 2012-17.

S Keshk, S. Physical properties of bacterial cellulose sheets produced in presence of lignosulfonate. Enzyme. Microb. Technol. 2006; 40, 9-12.