Biochemical Methane Potential of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Co-Digested with Rubber Latex Effluent (LTE): Effect of POME/LTE Ratio and Temperature

Authors

  • Nattawut YINGTHAVORN School of Engineering and TechnologySchool of Engineering and Technology, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
  • Laddawan NOYNOO School of Engineering and Technology, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
  • Tammathat BOONKAMNERD School of Engineering and Technology, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
  • Nirattisai RAKMAK School of Engineering and Technology, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
  • Chairat SIRIPATANA School of Engineering and Technology, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2021.6495

Keywords:

BMP, POME: LTE ratio, Temperature, Anaerobic co-digestion, GTS modeling

Abstract

Single anaerobic digestion of rubber latex effluent (LTE) is known to be difficult and low yield which produces biogas containing high sulfur dioxide and ammonia. This article investigates the potential of co-digestion of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and LTE both in terms of synergistic, inhibitory effects and process stability particularly in inferring what would happen in an industrial-scale biogas plant if this type of co-digestion is to be used. The article focuses on the biochemical methane potential (BMP) of POME-LTE at different mixing ratio within the temperature range of 30 - 45 °C, the range which is used in most commercial biogas power plants in Thailand. It was found that proper co-digestion between POME and LTE provided a good opportunity to optimize the bio-methane yield because of their synergistic effect. All mixing ratios provided stable biogas production up to at least 45 days. Co-digestion of POME and LTE had a synergistic effect that when mixing 80 - 90 % of POME with 10 - 20 % of LTE, it enhanced the BMP by 25 - 35 %. It is also recommended that, in mesophilic range, 45 °C would be the best for both methane yield and high methane content in the biogas. We also have illustrated that 2-substrate models (in this case the Gompertz 2 substrate (GTS) model) is very suitable for representing and describing co-digestion data because of their inherently multiple substrate tendency. In most cases, Gompertz-type equations for single substrate did not represent the accumulated biogas/methane data adequately.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

MA Abdel-Hadi. A simple apparatus for biogas quality determination. J. Agric. Eng. 2008; 25, 1055-66.

S Achinas and GJ Euverink. Theoretical analysis of biogas potential prediction from agricultural waste. Resource Efficient Technol. 2016; 2, 143-7.

D Batstone, J Keller, I Angelidaki, S Kalyuzhnyi, S Pavlostathis, A Rozzi and V Vavilin. Anaerobic digestion model No 1 (ADM1). Water Sci. Technol. 2002; 45, 65-73.

S Chaiprapat, S Wongchana, S Loykulnant, C Kongkaew and B Charnnok. Evaluating sulfuric acid reduction, substitution, and recovery to improve environmental performance and biogas productivity in rubber latex industry. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2014; 94, 420-9.

S Dechrugsa, D Kantachote and S Chaiprapat. Effects of inoculum to substrate ratio, substrate mix ratio and inoculum source on batch co-digestion of grass and pig manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2013; 146, 101-8.

R Jariyaboon, S O-Thong and P Kongjan. Bio-hydrogen and bio-methane potentials of skim latex serum in batch thermophilic 2-stage anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2015; 198, 198-206.

P Kongjan, R Jariyaboon and S O-Thong. Anaerobic digestion of skim latex serum (SLS) for hydrogen and methane production using a 2-stage process in a series of up-flow anaerobic sludgeblanket (UASB) reactor. Int. J. Hydrog. Energ. 2014; 39, 19343-8.

P Kongjan, K Sama, K Sani, R Jariyaboon and A Reungsang. Feasibility of bio-hythane production by co-digesting skim latex serum (SLS) with palm oil mill effluent (POME) through 2-phase anaerobic process. Int. J. Hydrog. Energ. 2018; 43, 9577-90.

M Mohammadi, HC Man, M Hassan and P Yee. Treatment of wastewater from rubber industry in Malaysia. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010; 9, 6233-43.

C Musikavong and S Gheewala. Assessing ecological footprints of products from the rubber industry and palm oil mills in Thailand. J. Clean. Prod. 2016; 142, 1148-57.

H Nguyen and T Luong. Situation of wastewater treatment of natural rubber latex processing in the Southeastern region. J. Viet. Environ. 2012; 2, 58-64.

L Noynoo, S Jijai, K Phayungphan, N Rakmak and C Siripatana. Gompertz-Type 2-Substrate Models for Batch Anaerobic Co-Digestion. Lecture Notes in Applied Mathematics and Applied Science in Engineering. Malaysia Technical Scientist Association, Malaysia, 2019, p. 21-30.

WF Owen, D Stuckey, JB Healy, L Young and PL McCarty. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. J. Water Rese. 1978; 13, 485-92.

J Patil, M Lourdu, A Raj, S Vinaykumar, H Manjunath and A Srinidhi. Biomethanation of water hyacinth, poultry litter, cow manure and primary sludge: A comparative analysis. Res. J. Chem. Sci. 2011; 1, 22-6.

T Rachadaporn, H Thongpan, N Rakmak and C Siripatana. Modeling of anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and domestic organic waste. J. Teknol. 2016; 78, 117-24.

E Rice and A Association. Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. In: RH Strauss (Ed.). American Public Health Association. 23rd ed. Washington DC, 2017.

C Siripatana, S Jijai and P Kongjan. Analysis and extension of Gompertz-type and monod-type equations for estimation of design parameters from batch anaerobic digestion experiments. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016; 1775, 030079.

J Triolo, SG Sommer, H Møller, M Weisbjerg and X Jiang. A new algorithm to characterize biodegradability of biomass during anaerobic digestion: Influence of lignin concentration on methane production potential. Bioresour. Technol. 2011; 102, 9395-402.

N Yingthavorn, N Rakmak, P Kongjan and C Siripatana. Mathematical modeling of existing 2-stage anaerobic digestion process for palm oil mill wastewater. J. Teknol. 2016; 78, 21-6.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-01

How to Cite

YINGTHAVORN, N. ., NOYNOO, L. ., BOONKAMNERD, T. ., RAKMAK, N. ., & SIRIPATANA, C. . (2020). Biochemical Methane Potential of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Co-Digested with Rubber Latex Effluent (LTE): Effect of POME/LTE Ratio and Temperature. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST), 17(12), 1321–1334. https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2021.6495