Synergistic Use of Genetic Algorithm and Spectral Angle Mapper for Hyperspectral Band Selection of Roof Materials
Keywords:
Hyperspectral, band selection, roof materials, genetic algorithm, classificationAbstract
Hyperspectral data are valuable for urban studies because of the continuous narrow bands and high spectral resolution of such data. However, using hyperspectral data presents certain difficulties because of the high dimensionality. Hyperspectral data dimensionality should be reduced without losing the spectral detail of the data. In this study, we aim to assess the capability of hyperspectral data to discriminate roof materials and evaluate the feasibility of the genetic algorithm (GA) combined with the spectral angle mapper classification to identify significant bands that are effective in discriminating roof materials. The performance of GA was estimated using the overall classification accuracy. Field spectral reflectance from 4 types of roof materials in different conditions based on age (new and old) was collected using an Analytical Spectral Devices FieldSpec 3 Spectroradiometer with a wavelength range of 350 nm to 2500 nm. In this study, we confirm the potential of GA, with high overall classification accuracy (85 %), for the selection of significant bands that have valuable information to discriminate various types of roof materials. Overall, the results from the GA analysis show 3 principle locations of bands which are located at 517, 823 and 2008 nm in the visible, near infrared and shortwave region for discriminating different materials. This finding is in agreement with previous studies in determining the significant bands for man-made materials discrimination. Previous studies also discovered similar locations and ranges in the electromagnetic spectrum.
Downloads
Metrics
References
HZM Shafri, E Taherzadeh, S Mansor and R Ashurov. Hyperspectral remote sensing of urban areas: An overview of techniques and applications. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Tech. 2012; 4, 1557-65.
X Hao and JJ Qu. Fast and highly accurate calculation of band averaged radiance. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2009; 30, 1099-108.
AA Green, Berman M, P Switzer and MD Craig. A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1988; 26, 65-74.
C Conese and F Maselli. Selection of optimum bands from TM scenes through mutual information analysis. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1993; 48, 2-11.
X Zhang and M Pazner. Comparison of lithologic mapping with ASTER, hyperion, and ETM data in the southeastern Chocolate Mountains, USA. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2007; 73, 555-61.
M Kudo and J Sklansky. Comparison of algorithms that select features for pattern classifiers. Pattern Recognit. 2000; 33, 25-41.
P Bajcsy and P Groves. Methodology for hyperspectral band selection. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2004; 70, 793-802.
C Vaiphasa, AK Skidmore, WF de Boer and T Vaiphasa. A hyperspectral band selector for plant species discrimination. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2007; 62, 225-35.
W Siedlecki and J Sklansky. A note on genetic algorithms for large-scale feature selection. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 1989; 10, 335-47.
S Yu, S De Backer and P Scheunders. Genetic feature selection combined with composite fuzzy nearest neighbor classifiers for hyperspectral satellite imagery. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 2002; 23, 183-90.
H Fang, S Liang and A Kuusk. Retrieving leaf area index using a genetic algorithm with a canopy radiative transfer model. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003; 85, 257-70.
S Li, H Wu, D Wan and J Zhu. An effective feature selection method for hyperspectral image classification based on genetic algorithm and support vector machine. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2011; 24, 40-8.
S Ullah, TA Groen, M Schlerf, AK Skidmore, W Nieuwenhuis, C Vaiphasa. Using a genetic algorithm as an optimal band selector in the mid and thermal infrared (2.5 - 14 µm) to discriminate vegetation species. Sensors 2012; 12, 8755-69.
NEM Nasarudin and HZM Shafri. Development and utilization of urban spectral library of remote sensing of urban environment. J. Urban. Environ. Eng. 2011; 5, 44-56.
M Herold, DA Roberts, ME Gardner and PE Dennison. Spectrometry for urban area remote sensing-Development and analysis of a spectral library from 350 to 2400 nm. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004; 91, 304-19.
JH Holland. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial System: An Introductory with Application to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1975.
DE Golberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston, USA, 1989.
F Kruse, A Lefkoff, J Boardman, K Heidebrecht, A Shapiro, P Barloon and AFH Goetz. The spectral image processing system (SIPS)-interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1993; 44, 145-63.
M Herold, ME Gardner and D Roberts. Spectral resolution requirements for mapping urban areas. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003; 41, 1907-19.
E Ben-Dor, N Levin and H Saaroni. A spectral based recognition of the urban environment using the visible and near-infrared spectral region (0.4 - 1.1 µm). A case study over Tel-Aviv, Israel. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2001; 22, 2193-218.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.